Christer L. – Family Medicine Specialist at Majorstuen Medisinske, Specialist in General Medicine with extensive experience in primary care, emergency medicine, and psychiatry. Physician entrepreneur
The Myth of Success: A Critical Review of “Doctor” and His Medical and Commercial Ventures
Bubble of Claims
The doctor, presents himself externally as a visionary specialist in general medicine, an entrepreneur, and an innovative leader in the Norwegian healthcare system. He claims to have founded groundbreaking companies, revolutionized telepsychiatry, developed aesthetic medical concepts, and delivered forward-looking solutions through architecture. However, a systematic review of public records and company data paints a very different picture, characterized by short-lived projects, misleading narratives, and financial failures.
After failing to establish himself within traditional clinical practice, it appears that the doctor has shifted focus from medical quality to brand building and digitally self promoted reputation. Instead of documenting actual clinical work or patient care, he relies on aesthetic staging and marketing language to create the impression of success without professional grounding.Christer T. Larsen, Linkedin,
Documented report reveals unsuccessful medical companies and marketing strategies used by the doctor to mislead health authorities and the community in Majorstuen, creating a false impression of success and reliability.
Majorstuen Medical Center AS (Family Medicine Specialist)
Period:
February 2023 to November 2024 approximately two and a half years of claims and misleading activity
Basic Company Information:
Legal Name: Majorstuen Medical Center AS
Organization Number: 923 241 035
Established: August 6, 2019
Voluntarily Dissolved: November 4, 2024
Number of Employees: 0
Share Capital: 30,000 NOK
Financial Situation:
Revenue in 2023: 0 NOK
Accumulated Losses: over 30,000 NOK
Business Activity: None
Equity: Negative, technically insolvent
Critical Analysis:
Majorstuen Medical Center AS appears to have functioned as a marketing construct rather than a professional medical environment. The company:
Used a name suggesting a large medical center in Majorstuen, Oslo.
Advertised addresses that did not match the official registration:
Registered address: Pilestredet 75A
Advertised address: Kirkeveien 65A, and later Slemdalsveien 1 under the name Medpoint
Did not inform patients about name changes or relocations.
Continued using the website majorstuenmedisinske.no to give a false impression of ongoing operations.
Conclusion:
This project did not provide any form of healthcare services to the community. It represents:
Unethical use of medical trust for marketing purposes.
Lack of transparency and accountability.
Misleading practices with a fictitious clinic front.
The company’s dissolution and complete financial failure confirm that it was never more than a name without substance.
Public Sources and Documentation:
Brønnøysundregistrene: Official company profile
Note: This report is based on publicly available information. It has been prepared in accordance with freedom of speech and the right to critical oversight of healthcare-related business operations.
Dreamskin AS, Honor or Fraud?
The company uses the name “Dreamskin”, identical to the world, famous trademark owned by Dior, without any license, authorization, or affiliation.
There is no sign of collaboration, partnership, or legal right to use the name in skincare, despite “Dreamskin” being a registered and protected trademark under Parfums Christian Dior since 2006.
The website Dreamskin.no uses images generated with artificial intelligence, without labeling them as retouched or synthetic, in violation of Norwegian laws on image labeling and marketing ethics.
Financial Facts from Brreg:
Financial Facts from Brreg / Official Records:
No revenue reported for 2023 (company registered late in October 2023; no full year financial data available)
Net loss for 2024: minor, approximately , 154 NOK (official records)
The company was registered in October 2023 and shows minimal financial activity since
No employees officially registered
Background and Structure:
The company was established by the same doctor behind several other inactive or symbolic businesses. There are no signs of real operations, customer base, or professional competence in cosmetic treatment.
Total Lack of Activity and Credibility:
No physical clinic with a known address or appointment booking
Images and content on the website are unverifiable and give a misleading impression of clinical success
No documented treatment experience, no professional certifications, or public authorization
Conclusion:
Dreamskin AS appears to be purely a marketing project, a facade without substance, used to create an impression of aesthetic and professional success. With zero revenue, legal violations, and misleading content, there is little doubt that this is an illusion, not a business.
About the Original Dior Dreamskin: A Scientific and Commercial Framework
Capture Totale (Dreamskin) is a premium product developed by Parfums Christian Dior, part of the group’s advanced skincare line under the Capture Totale brand, combining biotechnology, plant-based stem cells, and dermatological innovation. Dreamskin was launched in 2014 as a new type of skin-correcting treatment, focusing on optical skin improvement, pore reduction, and long-term skin rejuvenation, without being traditional makeup.
The DREAMSKIN trademark is legally registered and internationally protected under Nice Classification Class 3, covering cosmetic and dermatological products. Registration is via WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization), valid in over 30 jurisdictions including the EU, USA, Australia, and Norway.
Dior has built the Dreamskin brand through years of clinical studies, research on skin aging, and licensed distribution networks. The product is among the most recognized in the global luxury segment.
Using the identical name in the same industry (cosmetics and skincare) without a license or reference constitutes not only a legal violation but also an ethical and commercial distortion of the values the Dreamskin name represents: research, precision, and trust.
Statens helsetilsyn, Norwegian Board of Health Supervision | Helsetilsynet , Den norske legeforening , Legeforeningen, Statsforvaltaren i Østfold, Buskerud, Oslo og Akershus
HAS Architects AS/ Profession or Invention?
Overview:
HAS Architects AS was established in 2022 by the doctor’s brother, sister, and a close female friend. There are no documented architectural projects in public registers.
The doctor presents himself as a central figure and identifies as an “architect,” despite having neither education nor certification in architecture. This may indicate an attempt to obscure previous mistakes or initiatives in his medical career.
The company appears to be a fictitious entity used for self-promotion rather than a genuine architectural practice.
Advertised Address: Kirkeveien 65A
Observation (2024): The registered address is now Slemdalsveien 1, Oslo, which is the same location used by the doctor’s clinic. Previously, this address corresponded to an ice cream shop. This update indicates an ongoing uncertainty in establishing a stable business address and suggests that the company does not maintain a genuine, permanent location for receiving clients or conducting architectural operations.
Key Financial Figures (Source: Brreg / D&B / Proff.no 2024)
No revenue or profit in 2023
Net loss: −102,838 NOK
Revenue fell to only 16,000 NOK (2023)
No employees
Observation (2024): These financials reflect minimal activity with ongoing losses. The company continues to show no operational staff and very limited revenue, confirming the absence of real architectural projects or business activity.
Company Structure
The founders have personal or familial ties, giving the impression of a closed, non-professional initiative.
Observation (2024): Ownership and management remain within the doctor’s close family and friends, consistent with previous reports, reinforcing the perception of a non-professional setup.
Credibility and Public Presence
No known clients
No projects
The Facebook page has only one “like” from one of the founders
Legelisten.no, the preferred platform for reviews, shows no support for the doctor or any projects
No posts, followers, or engagement
Observation (2024): There is still no evidence of real architectural projects or clients, and the online presence remains minimal or inactive. The company displays no measurable professional engagement.
Operations and Marketing Observations
All content displayed on the company’s website consists of images digitally manipulated using Photoshop and AI, raising questions about the reality of the company’s operations.
The only promoted projects are linked to the doctor himself, suggesting an attempt to enhance personal image through fictitious medical and architectural facades.
The company’s address has changed from a former ice cream shop to the clinic’s location (Slemdalsveien 1, Oslo), confirming the continued lack of physical presence for any architectural operations.
HAS Architects AS shares its name with well, known offices such as the Turkish HAS Mimarlık and several international companies. This repetition raises suspicions of marketing motives intended to mislead the public or suggest connections to reputable institutions.
Sources
Proff.no (2024) / updated address and financials
Statens helsetilsyn, Norwegian Board of Health Supervision | Helsetilsynet , Den norske legeforening , Legeforeningen, Statsforvaltaren i Østfold, Buskerud, Oslo og Akershus
Medpoint AS / The Short Glimmer During the Pandemic
Organization Number: 925 770 914
Established: October 7, 2020, with the purpose of providing COVID-19 testing
Dissolved: Voluntarily dissolved on June 4, 2024
Number of Employees: 0
Financials 2023: Revenue of only 1,200 NOK and a loss of nearly –800,000 NOK
Source: Brønnøysundregistrene (brreg.no)
Advertised Address: Kirkeveien 65A
Analyse:
Medpoint AS fremstår som et spekulativt og kommersielt motivert forsøk på å kapitalisere på en nasjonal krise, uten å levere faktisk samfunnsverdi. Selskapet hadde ingen ansatte, ingen reell drift og endte i økonomisk fiasko. Dette gir inntrykk av en strategi preget mer av opportunistisk profittjakt enn medisinsk ansvar eller folkehelsebidrag.
Konklusjon:
Et overdrevent og mislykket prosjekt uten forankring i bærekraftige helsetjenester, snarere et eksempel på hvordan helsefaglig autoritet forsøkes brukt for kortsiktig gevinst i krisetid.
Kilder:
Brønnøysundregistrene / Medpoint AS (Org.nr 828 486 462)
Merk: Det finnes også en annen virksomhet registrert med samme navn Medpoint AS (Org.nr 828 486 462) etablert i oktober 2021 med annen ledelse og eierstruktur. Legen har hatt begrenset tilknytning som styremedlem i denne senere oppstartede enheten, men er ikke registrert som stifter eller eier. Dette er viktig å presisere for å unngå sammenblanding mellom to separate foretak med identisk navn.
Den medisinske klinikken med navnet Medpoint AS fremstår ved første øyekast som en forlengelse av en internasjonal gruppe særlig på grunn av kjente navn som Medpoint Management og MedPoint. Bruken av et nesten identisk navn reiser spørsmål om hensikten er å dra nytte av andres etablerte omdømme for å skape tillit og troverdighet hos pasienter og tilsynsmyndigheter.
Majorstuen Medisinske Senter AS/ A Clinic Without Substance or Credibility
Organization Number: 923 241 035
Facts:
Registered in 2019, deleted on November 4, 2024 (formally dissolved) (proff.no)
No employees, minimal share capital, and persistently negative equity (regnskapstall.no)
Marketing and Deceptive Practices:
Presented itself as a comprehensive “medical center” in Majorstuen, despite lacking a genuine physical presence, closer to a small retail unit than a clinic.
Titles, addresses, and branding were repeatedly changed to create the impression of “success and growth.”
Regulatory Oversight and Abuse of Authority:
According to helserett.com, the doctor was accused of creating disorder at Skøyen Health Center and of systematically coercing patients by violating their medical records.
Available information suggests that health authorities under the County Governor of Oslo and Viken entered into cooperation and supported the doctor based on misleading information, handing over documents intended to pressure the patient into silence. This was later revealed to be an attempt to conceal serious misconduct. After the facts emerged, the doctor’s unethical practices were strongly criticized by health authorities such as the Norwegian Directorate of Health and the Norwegian Board of Health Supervision, both of which called for police investigation. This led to a significant loss of trust and raised serious concerns about the integrity and judgment of the involved public authorities.
Recorded statements show the doctor accusing patients of lying and expressing complete distrust toward them, a serious departure from professional clinical practice.
Falsification of workplace information and manipulation of the doctor’s place of work, deviating from what is registered in the Helsenorge.no records.
The investigation revealed that the doctor encouraged health authorities in his own district (Frogner) to intervene and influence authorities in (Ullern). As a result of this influence, the patient was deprived of access to healthcare and support and consequently lost entitlement to health-related benefits for the period 2024–2025.
Source: helserett.com
Financial Status:
No real income, only expenses and negative operating results throughout the company’s existence.
Multiple companies were registered at the same address without generating profits, everything revolved around shell projects.
Despite claims of a “healthcare empire,” there is no documentation supporting such assertions.
Conclusion:
Majorstuen Medisinske Senter AS is not an authentic clinical project but rather a complete illusion characterized by:
Abuse of medical trust
Systematic patient coercion
Misleading marketing and fabricated success narratives / digital smoke screens
Violations of professional and ethical standards, including misuse of medical records and lack of trust in patients
Sources:
Brønnøysundregistrene: Legal details, dissolution date, and financial structure
Proff.no: Title changes, address usage, and negative business cycle (proff.no)
Helserett.com: Disclosures regarding coercion, disorder, and false statements, supported by evidence and official documents.
Kirkeveien 64A: One Address, Multiple Entities with Changing Names and Repeated Activity
The clinic at Kirkeveien 64A does not appear as a single successful and stable medical practice, but functions as a platform for multiple entities registered under different names. When a project fails or loses credibility, the name is changed, while the address and marketing remain the same.
Examples of such entities include:
Majorstuen Medisinske Senter AS
HAS Architects AS
Medpoint AS
…and other companies connected to the same person and address, with some continuity in the type of activity.
A Name, Change Strategy: Persistent Attempts to Build a New Reputation
The doctor appears to present these initiatives as proof of professional success, but public registers and independent reports reveal clear missteps and persistent challenges related to organizational and financial stability.
The recurring pattern:
Establish a company with a medical or aesthetic profile
Conduct marketing campaigns of questionable legality, with limited actual substance, often characterized by exaggerated claims
Receive negative feedback or incur financial losses
Dissolve the project and relaunch it under a new name at the same address
Possible Psychological Considerations:
It may appear that the doctor acts under the assumption that such practices are common in the industry, which could influence how he presents the businesses and justifies repeating the same pattern.
Conclusion:
The address Kirkeveien 64A does not appear to be a place for reliable and stable medical operations, but rather as a base for failed entities with repeated name changes. The address can be seen as a sign of trust issues and underscores the need for transparency, credibility, and professional quality in the healthcare sector.
ePsyk AS: A Healthcare Project Without Professional Foundation?
Time Period
From establishment on June 28, 2019, to June 2025 nearly six years of ambitious marketing claims with limited documentation of actual treatment outcomes.
Basic Company Information
Legal Name: ePsyk AS
Organization Number: 923 173 846
Established: June 28, 2019
Registered Address: C.J. Hambros Plass 2C
Profit Before Tax (2023): 231,115 NOK
Equity: 752,711 NOK
Source: Proff.no
Comment: Financial figures indicate a moderate operation that does not support claims of national leadership in mental health.
Address and Physical Presence
C.J. Hambros Plass 2C: A virtual office provided by MatchOffice, not a physical clinic.
This raises questions about whether ePsyk actually has any real physical presence or patient intake.
Organization and Ownership
It is important to note that Doctor Liar, despite a prominent profile in marketing ePsyk AS, holds no leadership role. He is neither CEO nor chairperson and has no signing authority.
According to Brønnøysundregistrene:
He is not registered as CEO and has no formal decision-making authority in company operations or strategic direction.
Signing authority is solely delegated to Chairperson Peder Anker and CEO Henrik Lind.
In other words, Doctor Liar has no legal right to bind the company and acts only as one of several board members, without any real governance role.
This clearly indicates that his role in ePsyk AS is marginal or symbolic, primarily serving as an attempt to give the company a professional outward image rather than reflecting actual influence or operational participation.
Source: Brønnøysundregistrene
Transparency and Verifiability
No published reports, research articles, or statistics supporting the success stories.
No documented professional presence in medical media or conferences.
Provider List: Authorized Therapists or Decoration?
From [ePsyk.no, provider overview]:
Coach (life coach): Not authorized healthcare personnel. Lacks medical training and professional supervision.
Priest: Provides spiritual care, a religious support form without evidence based treatment foundation.
Midwife: Competent in childbirth, not mental health.
Career Advisor: Career guidance, not psychotherapy.
“Celebrity Psychologist” (@psyktdeg): Primarily a social media marketing figure.
Psychologist and Psychiatrist: Only Ellisiv Lindanger and Alexandru Tunsu appear as authorized and relevant specialists.
Source: ePsyk.no / Provider List
This suggests that the majority of providers are not qualified under the Health Personnel Act to deliver mental healthcare.
About the Team (LinkedIn Investigation)
Several profiles appear only as "LinkedIn Member" without full names or clear titles.
Several claim psychologist or counselor titles but work in entirely different industries / psychology appears as an addition or marketing gimmick.
Source: LinkedIn
About the Contact Method
“The video based contact method lacks clinical depth and resembles commercial surface models more than serious medical practice.”
ePsyk AS appears more as a marketing concept than a healthcare service with real clinical capacity.
This poses a double risk for patients seeking help in vulnerable moments.
The absence of emergency preparedness or clear protocols for crisis management leaves patients with suicidal thoughts or severe mental disorders completely isolated, unprotected, and without immediate referral options. This may worsen conditions rather than help.
The most concerning aspect is that the business is packaged in a professional facade, fronted by individuals without legal or professional responsibility. They have no formal role in patient care or medical follow up.
Despite this, ePsyk still offers its services at high prices, without pricing transparency or support for low-income groups a purely commercial system covering mental illness with a cold, digital surface.
Conclusion
ePsyk AS appears more as a marketing-driven concept than a healthcare operation with real clinical capacity:
Absence of employees
Use of virtual offices
Anonymous or incomplete profiles
Claims without documented basis
Majority of providers without healthcare authorization
Patients risk receiving guidance from individuals without clinical background, from home offices, under a professional exterior that does not necessarily reflect reality.
Sources:
Brønnøysundregistrene
Proff.no, Company Analysis
MatchOffice.no Virtual Offices
ePsyk.no Provider List
LinkedIn ePsyk AS
⚠️ Fact:
Based on available information, the doctor has registered clinics under his name, but these are not operational and do not provide real or authorized healthcare services on a regular basis. There is also no evidence that authorized medical personnel work under his supervision, contrary to what is marketed. No regular or approved healthcare services are provided to patients in a documented manner.
Although there is no real clinical activity behind the name, the doctor uses lies and deception as a strategy to create a false impression of success. He copies ideas and projects from international companies in hopes of gaining recognition, uses AI generated images, and provides false addresses some of which actually lead to ice cream shops on Google Maps.
This is not just about exaggerated claims, but systematic manipulation based on documented experience and concrete evidence. His cooperation with certain actors in the County Governor’s office occurred through fraud, allowing him to bypass responsibility and oversight. It appears he has turned this into a shortcut toward a fabricated career built on deceit.
Used Address:
The address used in marketing for multiple projects, including Dreamskin AS and HAS Architects AS, as well as the alleged medical clinics, does not correspond to any real medical or commercial business. A Google search shows the address as an ice cream shop, not a medical office, architecture firm, or other active healthcare facility.
It should be noted that this address has been used for several years in official licenses and advertising, which may give the impression of established and functioning entities, raising questions about compliance with regulations.
The repeated use of the same address for multiple projects without a real connection to the premises raises credibility concerns and may indicate hidden intentions with legal implications.
Revenue:
Public financial records show an absence of revenue and repeated financial losses, indicating a lack of real activity in either medical or commercial business and highlighting the need for further investigation.
Disclosures:
It has been revealed that the advertised address does not match the doctor’s operations, including what is referred to as Majorstuen Medisinske Senter. Manipulation of patient reviews has also been observed, despite the absence of employees or active healthcare services on-site.
Public complaints and documented audio recordings with inappropriate statements about patients have helped highlight possible misrepresentation of medical competence. As a result, the business was closed voluntarily by the doctor in 2024, although the marketing of the address and clinic continued until May 2025, when these issues were exposed.
Implications for Trust in Healthcare:
The information indicates concerning behavior characterized by concealment and distortion of facts, potentially undermining trust among patients and the public in the healthcare system.
It also raises questions about whether regulatory authorities exercised sufficient ethical responsibility, particularly regarding patient rights and transparency.
Among the practices in question are:
Presentation of potentially inaccurate or exaggerated information.
Use of undocumented marketing with claims that require verification.
Systematic manipulation of reviews on public healthcare websites, including fake reviews for services never provided, several written by the doctor himself. Following exposure by Helserett.com, these were immediately removed. This demonstrates not only a lack of transparency but also a serious breach of professional ethics.
Use of names of recognized clinics and companies without legal permission or real partnerships, such as Dreamskin Dior, Medpoint (USA), and HAS Architects (Turkey), to create a false impression of professionalism.
Conclusion:
Based on the available evidence, it is assumed that the doctor has used misleading communication methods and established connections with multiple entities, including regulatory authorities, without adequate verification of the actual circumstances.
This requires thorough follow-up by relevant authorities to ensure compliance with professional, legal, and ethical standards, given the potential negative consequences for patients’ rights and safety, as well as the reputation of the healthcare system.
tatens helsetilsyn, Norwegian Board of Health Supervision | Helsetilsynet , Den norske legeforening , Legeforeningen, Statsforvaltaren i Østfold, Buskerud, Oslo og Akershus